First off, I have owned a 2016 Harley TGU for 6 months now and have about 5400 miles on it. I had ridden a friend's 2015 TGU and thought that it might be time to get off my 2012 RGU being that I have a bit of a gimpy left hip.
Yesterday, I went over to our local Can-Am dealer and sat on a 2016 Spyder RT Limited Can-Am. The new Rotax engine reportedly has more grunt, gets better gas mileage and makes the Can-Am reportedly peppier in most categories including reduced felt heat to the rider.
The only other factory "trike" that I have sat in is the new Polaris Slingshot. That seems like a larger departure from motorcycling than either the TGU or the RT or other Can-Am's and the Harley Freewheeler.
On one of the older threads on this forum, I was reading about the reported woes of some of the aftermarket manufacturers of trike conversion kits following the introductions of the above-mentioned three factory trikes and how the finance/insurance industry has sort of put a whammy on that aspect of the industry.
The reason that I went over to sit on the Can-Am was that there was this little nagging voice in the back of my head that said to me, "Bob, you know that the TGU is a bit retro in terms of engineering and being state-of-the-art" as the EITMS kicked in on a hot 85 degree day yesterday cruising around town on my straight axle ride. I used to go primarily for state-of-the-art sport bikes during that phase of my riding career and wondered if I wasn't missing something by not having looked at the 2016 Can-Am Spyder RT Limited in person before pulling the trigger on a new TGU. I had sat on a much older version of a Can-Am Spyder and it did not knock my sox off.
My experience sitting on the Can-Am was an interesting one. The suspension is so vastly more forgiving than the Harley but it also occurred to me that there are something like 6-7 computers that manage all of the complex systems on the Can-Am and the bike requires full-time electronic stability control that is not found on the Harley. Not sure how many computer systems manage the Harley?
Additionally, for some reason, although the TGU has a lot of fiberglass and some metal, the Spyder felt to me like it was mostly plastic.
Sort of a different feeling about it compared to the "tractor" Harley.
Additionally, I have never hankered for an automatic/push button shifter which is the norm for the Can-Am RT.
Well, I rode my TGU home and have been stewing over my experience for the past 24 hours and have not come to any profound truths. However, my gut tells me that I am pretty glad that I got the Harley over the Can-Am, even though the Can-Am seems significantly more sophisticated. The Slingshot to me is not even close to the motorcycle experience so I am not jonesing for it although it is one seemingly very sophisticated and state-of-the-art trike.
So, after doing all of this after-purchase musing that is essentially ass-backward, I think I made the correct decision for myself given the current factory options. I am however, very interested in hearing others viewpoints about this state of affairs since this is a trike forum and all kinds of different trike riders/owners are represented which gives us a better cross-section of folks that like and ride trikes. And please no flaming suggesting that I am a troll for Harley. I am seriously interested in my decision making and that of others concerning how we all uniquely arrived at our chosen ride.