I know there are benefits to EFI bikes, and I enjoy some of them myself...but I still prefer a carbed bike. But, if you need to have an EFI bike, the Power Vision is the bomb in making it easier to work with.
Kevin
I too prefer a carbed bike ... it's the technology I grew up with. Having said that, i am rapidly learning that "knowing what the ECM knows" is the most valuable tool in my arsenal. And it's becoming readily apparent, the Power Vision is the tool that gets me there. It's easy to use and very powerful. I would caution others, that Win PV is a tad dangerous if you start changing things you don't understand. Don't ask how I know ... LOL.
Thanks again to Kevin and Jack for their insight and help.
Having said that ... LOL ... I am still playing.
Early on, last Friday too be exact (seems like years ago), I loaded the Tri tune I had and started auto tuning to dial it in to this bike. After one tuning run, I loaded the exported tune to "do it again", the bike coughed and almost died. In hind sight, I think there rear O2 sensor was still going to closed loop, but, giving the PV bad data to tune against. I then went to a canned dyno jet tune for my config. This afternoon, I reloaded the tune I got from Kevin that was my Tri Tune .. apparently I didn't save it, but, Kevin did. I went on a 30 something mile ride. No fault codes.
Here is some observations that I don't understand about the two tunes.
Tune One, the dyno jet tune taken from their website for a 2014, wet head, with stage 1 breather, Vance and Hines Power Dual head pipe and Vance and Hines Hi Flow Slip ons. I will call the the canned tune.
Tune Two, An auto tuned version of the dyno jet tune with stage 1 breather, fulsac no cat head pipe (closest I could find to stock de catted) and screaming eagle slip ons. I will call this my tune.
Now for the observations, and I'm hoping someone can explain them (right now, I kind of feel like it's in my head)
1) With my tune, the bike seams to generate power more effortlessly, this may just be because of observation 2.
2) With my tune, there "seems" to be less engine noise so I tend to just hear the nice deep rumble from the exhaust (this alone seems to be enough for me to like the tune). Even the exhaust sounds quieter.
3) With the canned tune, the rear o2 sensor reads voltages in the 200-300% range higher than the front o2 sensor and stays kind of steady. With my tune, the rear o2 sensor reads closer to 40-50% higher than the front and fluctuates way more, but, not at the rate of the front. The 40-50% higher seems to be consistent at all fluctuations, but I would need to start a data log and look at it while not riding to confirm that (I learned early on to not get enamored with the PV gauges, almost wrecked the Tri at 75 mph).
It should be noted here, the only change I made to My Tune, was to change the speedo calibration pulses to 2153 (normally a two wheeler would be 2146, I think, but, my original tune had 2153 so I thought what the heck, maybe the tuner did this cal for this bike). In any event, there should be no "tuning difference".
So. I'm looking forward to your thoughts on my observations. If you think it's all in my head, I'm okay with that, I've been called crazy before.